Overview
What is LoadComplete?
SmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.
Smart tool for Load Testing
LoadComplete for basic load testing
LoadComplete: Great software but lacks proper support
LoadComplete - Smart and fast tool for load tests development.
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Popular Features
- End to end performance management (5)8.484%
- Real time monitoring (5)7.979%
- Deployment model flexibility (5)6.969%
Pricing
Subscription Starter
$239
On-demand Starter
$287
Subscription Pro
$699
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $287 one-time fee
Product Demos
Pagination in LoadComplete 2.6 Demo
Features
Load Testing
Load testing is the simplest form of performance testing and is designed to test system behavior under expected loads
- 8.4End to end performance management(5) Ratings
Identify end to end performance bottlenecks, not just web application response time
- 9.5Integrated performance data(4) Ratings
Cross-analysis of data gathered from all the components of the application
- 6.9Deployment model flexibility(5) Ratings
Software can be deployed in testing lab, and also in cloud
- 7.9Real time monitoring(5) Ratings
Real time monitoring means monitoring the entire application environment while under load
- 8.4Automated anomaly detection(4) Ratings
Automated anomaly detection helps detect exception conditions that can be the cause of performance degradation
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is LoadComplete?
LoadComplete Competitors
LoadComplete Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(6)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-5 of 5)LoadComplete is best option for Beginners
- Very detailed documentation, easy to support
- Running my test on Cloud
- The reports graph are very clear with logs and errors found in the report manel
- Record and Play Feature
- coding is not an optional in the loadComplete scripts
- the tool is too slow after exceeding 1000 Concurent users
- Cloud testing including the cloud test cost estimator
- Debug Client-Side Issues in Real Time through a JavaScript console
- Record And Play Feature
- End to end performance management
- 80%8.0
- Integrated performance data
- 90%9.0
- Deployment model flexibility
- 60%6.0
- Real time monitoring
- 80%8.0
- Automated anomaly detection
- 70%7.0
- The Reports Generated are very clear and descriptive
- its a tool for both amateurs and experts, so it a quick win for beginners to use
- Negative : its expensive
Despite JMeter has more features for Complex Scenarios (for example Scripting ) and is free to use, but Load Complete covers all the Quality Aspects Needs in load testing.
Smart tool for Load Testing
- We have been using LoadComplete in the Tech Department. I usually use LoadComplete to test the speed and loads of several applications we develop in-house.
- Moreover, we have also used LoadComplete to create reports and at the same time report any issues that we notice during a certain load.
- It is an affordable platform.
- LoadComplete has a lot of good features which has made my life so much easier so there are many pros of this tool as well. It is quite easy to use and comes in very handy.
- Some of the cons of LoadComplete are that it gets slow when the size of the test increases. Also, the coding is not possible with LoadComplete.
- Moreover, it needs to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on the needs. Also, some graphs remain empty which is confusing for me as a user and I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
- Efficient reporting.
- Data security.
- Automation is smart.
- End to end performance management
- 90%9.0
- Integrated performance data
- 100%10.0
- Deployment model flexibility
- 80%8.0
- Real time monitoring
- 80%8.0
- Automated anomaly detection
- 100%10.0
- This tool always yields eye-catching results. It has good support from the documentation. Also, it generates detailed reports which is a very good thing.
- There is also a record and play feature in LoadComplete which means all applications can be recorded like Applications Servers’ Metric and so on.
- This tool has a good reporting and record playback due to which I will recommend it.
LoadComplete for basic load testing
- Easy and handy UI options to select
- Good support from documentation
- Eye-catching results
- Slow when the size of tests increase
- Coding is not possible
- Need to support flexibility for a framework that can be customized based on needs
- End to end performance management
- 30%3.0
- Integrated performance data
- 70%7.0
- Deployment model flexibility
- 10%1.0
- Real time monitoring
- 50%5.0
- Automated anomaly detection
- 40%4.0
- ROI is a different factor to consider.
- Not a great tool for load testing if that is the real purpose.
- JMeter being open-source can easily yield good ROI compared to LoadComplete.
LoadComplete: Great software but lacks proper support
- Able to generate detailed reports.
- Displays graphs during load testing to show the user (Performance Engineer) where a bottleneck occurred.
- Ability to run tests in the cloud.
- Port test scripts from TestComplete.
- Some graphs remain empty, I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
- Allow user to customize the graph.
If loadcomplete is not paired with testcomplete, there could be a bit of a learning curve. One feature I don't like about LoadComplete is the lack to write your own scripts. You must do the play back, record and update several variables if you are to have dynamic tests.
- End to end performance management
- 80%8.0
- Integrated performance data
- 70%7.0
- Deployment model flexibility
- 80%8.0
- Real time monitoring
- 80%8.0
- Automated anomaly detection
- N/AN/A
- Negative: Licensing fees are too expensive.
- Positive: Able to generate and present reports, Able to show developers where bottleneck shows up.
- Positive: Easy to understand software to train new users.
- Neotys
LoadComplete - Smart and fast tool for load tests development.
As a little bonus, although LoadComplete is not a tool for API testing, it can run API calls, and sometimes it is rather helpful for us.
- Smart built-in data correlation. Automatically helps to correlate different dynamic parameters like user session ids, authorization tokens, db-identifiers and so on. Works very fast and save your time for test development.
- Record & Play feature - LoadComplete can record application servers' metrics like CPU and memory usage.
- Rather slow work with logging, especially on long tests. Test logs can occupy a big memory space.
- Coding is not presented in LoadComplete, we can use only predefined features, so we have some limitations in test development.
- End to end performance management
- 70%7.0
- Deployment model flexibility
- 100%10.0
- Real time monitoring
- 90%9.0
- Automated anomaly detection
- 70%7.0
- Many built-in features (like auto data correlation, load distributing etc) will save time for development.